Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 32 of 32

Thread: about sharpness of super8

  1. #31
    Inactive Member michael2's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 30th, 2003
    Posts
    7
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    thank you mr scottness for the quality of your super8 stills.
    But now i am a bit suprised by the low quality of the DV images. The problem is that one can't compare an interlaced still with a non interlaced super8 image. I thought this new JVC cam was flabbergasting as far as quality.
    Just take a look to this still generated with a same
    price cam (progressive/non-interlaced) dvx-100 panasonic:

    http://perso.wanadoo.fr/filmexperiment/landscape.jpg

    this is the hardest thing to film with non HD material: sharp landscaping. The panasonic is quite amazing even handheld.

    But still it stays video.
    Conclusion: i am quite ready to sacrifice sharpness for
    working with film. I will start with K40. As soon as i get some good stills, i will post them.
    Thanks everybody for your good advices.

  2. #32
    Inactive Member awand's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 9th, 2001
    Posts
    20
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Here's an example of the best Super8 Kodachrome 40 frame I've grabbed so far with my WP setup:

    http://www.8mm.filmshooting.com/scri...MGA0227?full=1

    /Andreas

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •